Legal Overview

The lease agreement explicitly prohibited mobile towers and telecommunications equipment. Telstra installed them anyway, constituting a clear breach of contract.

This violation forms the foundation of our legal case, as it demonstrates willful disregard for a legally binding agreement.

The unauthorized chemical spraying caused documented environmental damage to private property, which constitutes both property damage and potential environmental law violations.

Environmental assessments have confirmed contamination that requires professional remediation.

Telstra's actions constitute trespass and unauthorized use of private property, violating fundamental property rights protected under Australian law.

The continued presence of unauthorized equipment represents an ongoing violation of property rights.

Telstra's failure to address these issues for six years demonstrates a pattern of corporate negligence and potential violations of consumer protection laws.

This case raises important questions about corporate accountability and transparency in Australia.