Back to Evidence Vault

The Lease Agreement

The contract that Telstra signed—and then violated

Section 4.2 - Equipment Restrictions

"NO MOBILE TOWERS OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED, CONSTRUCTED, OR OPERATED ON THE LEASED PREMISES"

Signed by: Telstra Corporation Limited
Date: March 15, 2018
Witness: Legal representative present
Status: Legally binding contract

Contract Analysis

Clear and Unambiguous Language

The prohibition on mobile towers wasn't buried in fine print or expressed in complex legal jargon. It was stated clearly, in plain English, in a dedicated section of the contract. There is no reasonable interpretation of this clause that would permit the installation of a mobile phone antenna.

Negotiated Term

This wasn't a standard boilerplate clause. Kim specifically requested this prohibition during contract negotiations. Telstra's representatives discussed it, understood it, and agreed to it. The clause exists because Kim made it a condition of the lease.

Binding Agreement

This is a legally binding contract between two parties. Telstra cannot simply ignore clauses they find inconvenient. The contract was executed properly, with legal representation, and remains in full force and effect.

Material Breach

Installing a mobile tower in direct violation of this clause constitutes a material breach of contract. This isn't a minor technical violation—it's a fundamental breach of the core terms that Kim insisted upon.

Contract Timeline

March 2018
Contract negotiations begin. Kim insists on tower prohibition.
March 15, 2018
Lease agreement signed with tower prohibition clause.
2018-2019
Lease payments made regularly. No issues reported.
August 2019
Mobile tower installed in direct violation of contract.
2019-2025
Tower remains in place despite ongoing complaints.

Legal Implications

This contract violation has serious legal implications that extend far beyond Kim's individual case. If major corporations can simply ignore signed contracts when it suits their business interests, the entire foundation of commercial law is undermined.

The breach is clear, documented, and ongoing. Telstra has had multiple opportunities to remedy the violation and has chosen not to do so. This demonstrates a pattern of deliberate disregard for contractual obligations.

The case sets an important precedent for property rights, contract enforcement, and corporate accountability in Australia. Every landowner who signs a contract with a major corporation has a stake in the outcome.

Download the Complete Contract

Get the full lease agreement with all terms, conditions, and signatures.